Feasible Solutions for the Great Sea Interconnector Without Geopolitical Risk

This analysis examines alternative routes for the Great Sea Interconnector (GSI), aiming to avoid geopolitical risks. It proposes connecting the cable through Greece, Egypt, and Israel, bypassing Turkey and ensuring energy security.

The initial proposal involves routing from Crete to Egypt, utilizing the agreement on the EEZ between Greece and Egypt, and then to Israel and Cyprus. If Egypt does not comply with the agreements, a direct connection from Crete to Israel is proposed.

The main problem is Turkey and its claims in the Eastern Mediterranean. The proposed alternative routes aim to bypass Turkish influence and highlight Greece, Egypt, and Israel as energy hubs.

The analysis underscores the importance of energy security for Israel and Cyprus, as well as the project's connection to the IMEC trade corridor, supported by the US.

Additionally, it mentions that Exxon Mobil's recent agreement with Libya for research in the EEZ, in accordance with international maritime law, renders the Turkish-Libyan memorandum illegal.

In conclusion, it is proposed to activate the 3+1 scheme (Greece-Cyprus-Israel with the US) or 4+1 (Greece-Egypt-Israel-Cyprus with the US) for the successful implementation of the project.

Ταξίαρχος (Π.Α.) ε.α.